Gibbs Phase Rules

nw: Number of ways to do work nc: Number of chemical +1: Heating/ cooling N=nw+nc+1 is the number of intensive parameters.

Constraints: If 2 phases coexist μ=μg is one constraint. If 3 phases coexist μ=μg and μ=μs gives 2 constraints. So, let p be the number of constraints. Then the degrees of freedom in our system is f=nw+nc+1p. Suppose we have 1 species (nc=1) and 1 way of doing work (mechanical/ pressure for example) so f=3p. If we have 1 phase, p=1 so f=2 and so p(T) is an area. If we have 2 phases, p=2 so f=1 and so p(T) is a line. If we have 3 phases, p=3 so f=1 and so p(T) is a point (triple point).

Say we fix N, then we can plot P versus V/N.

20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_111217.png

20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_111310.png

20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_111850.png

C.f. Suppose we have an alloy: 20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_111829.png

Suppose that we have a constant temperature G(T,p,N).

Then the Gibbs free energy of a liquid, we have a similar picture as F with T and N. So, plotting G(p,T,N) versus temperature, we get two lines for liquids and gas that intersect at TT. The liquid line has a more gradual slope and a lower intercept. In the region before the TT the gas line is called a supercooled gas and in the region after the liquid line (now above the gas line) is called a superheadted liquid.

So, G(T,p,N)=μNμ=GN. I.e. the chemical potential of liquid is less than that of a gas. S=(GT)P,N. ΔSg=QT=LNT where L is the latent heat per particle. Hence, L=ΔSTN. IMPORTANT To compute the latent heat you need to compute the entropy change. ΔS= change in the slopes at the transition temperature.

Van der Waals Equation of State

(p+aN2V2)(VNb)=NkT a measures the attractive forces and b measures the volume taken up by each particle.

Recall analysis from previous homeworks. p(V)Vγ.

Stability conditions. For each conjugate pair you have (x, f) then (xf)0. Except, α=1VVTor0. Compressibility gives condition for unstable states.

Between the two points we can draw a line at constant P such that area above equals area below. This denotes area of equal coexistence and so μ=μg. The dotted lines are unphysical regions. 20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_113729.png From pG, dG=SdT+Vdp+μdN. So ΔGg=gdG=ppgV(p). 20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230414_114249.png

For a Reaction

3H2+N22NH3. In this setup, these could all be in a gaseous state. Assume this is the case. So [H2]3[N2]kR(T)=ΓR(T,p) and ΓL(T)=kL(T)[NH3]2. Then, [NH3]2[H2]3[N2]=keq(T). This is the Law of mass action. Finding keq(T) we use the knowledge we are in gas phase and chemical potentials are equal.

Treat each constituent as an ideal gas. ZFμ(T). ΔF=(FNH2)ΔNH2+(FNN2)ΔNN2+(FNNH3)ΔNNH3

Considering the rightwards direction: ΔFR=3μH2μN2+2μNH3. ΔFL=ΔFR.

F(T,V,N)=NkT(lnNVλ31)+NF0 where the last term arises from the internal degrees of freedom of each of the N particles. So, μ(T,V,N)=(FN)T,V=kT(lnNVλ31)+NkT1N+F0=kTlnNV+kTlnλ3+F0=kTlnNV+C(T)+F0. Inserting this in 3μH2μN2+2μNH3=0, we get 3ln[H2]ln[N2]+2ln[NH3]=2CH2+CN22CNH3+3F0,H2+F0,N22F0,NH3=ΔFnet. Then, [NH3]2[H2]3[N2]=keq(T)=k0exp(ΔFnetkT). Recall, ΔF=ΔETΔSΔEnet for solids and chemistry. Then, k0=λH29λN23λNH36=h6mNH338π(kBT)3mH29/2mN23/2T3.

Aside: C.f. with hydrogen atom, [p][e][H]=k(T) with np=k(T).

Consider the one way reaction consisting of 5 particles, 3H2+N2NH3. If we have M particles then we get a 3M dimensional space. Then we want to minimize energy in our 3M-1 dimensional space. Let X be the reaction coordinate. Let the y-axis be the energy. 20230130110456-statistical_mechanics.org_20230419_112240.png We argue that the rate is proportional to the Boltzman factor, γexp(BkT), problem 6.11. The assumptions are: no recrossing, reactions are in local equilibrium (in ’well’), equal distribution determines the number of particles crossing the well. Let the probability distribution of the particles ρ(x). Then the probability distribution at the bottom of the well is ρ(x0) and at the barrier ρ(xb) such that ρ(xb)ρ(x0)=exp(U(xB)/kT)exp(U(x))/kT=exp(B/kT). Since BkT, most particles are near x0. Then, U(x)=12Mω2(xx0)2. So, ρ(x)=mω22πkTexp(mω22kT(xx0)2) And so, ρ(x0)=mω22πkT.

If the particle is Δx away from the top of the barrier with velocity v then Δx=vΔt gives the rate ΓV=ρ(xB)vΔtΔt=ρ(xb)v. So, for all positive velocities, Γ=0dvΓvρ(v). Then, we are in equilibrium our velocities are normal distributed velocities, ρ(v)exp(Ekin/kT)=exp(Mv2kT) so ρ(v)=M2πkTexp(Mv22kT). Thus, Γ=ρ(xB)0vρ(v)dv=ω2πexp(BkT). Using multidimensional transition rate: Γ=iωi2πjωj,Bexp(BkT). Where ωj,B denotes the saddle points.

If ω is large we get a steep well.

Thus, in general it is difficult to analyze kinetic behaviors from equilibrium treatments.

Author: Christian Cunningham

Created: 2024-05-30 Thu 21:19

Validate